https://www.bookogs.com/credit/149219-n-b-markovich
I merged a translator credit, so please delete this one.

In such cases, i just delete the content and change the name to Duplicate

GruenerTee wrote:

In such cases, i just delete the content and change the name to Duplicate

Unfortunately in some cases there are too much entries already written. Plus this base lacks heavily Discogs ANV

I've just tried your variant but the entry still exists, as far as I understand there is no delete funcion here yet

nickist420 wrote:

GruenerTee wrote:

In such cases, i just delete the content and change the name to Duplicate

Me too, I then use that Duplicate to make the next credit I enter.

Unfortunately in some cases there are too much entries already written. Plus this base lacks heavily Discogs ANV

We have ANV here too. It's available on all credit fields.

Yes
Supernaut1970 wrote:

nickist420 wrote:

GruenerTee wrote:

In such cases, i just delete the content and change the name to Duplicate

Me too, I then use that Duplicate to make the next credit I enter.

Unfortunately in some cases there are too much entries already written. Plus this base lacks heavily Discogs ANV

We have ANV here too. It's available on all credit fields.

Yes there are anv but they are not indicated on pages of the authors, publishers or works. ANV aren't indexed in search form, it's not convenient to type the exact name insted of anv

I've renamed/reused the empty ones.

In such cases, i just delete the content and change the name to Duplicate

Yep, or if you have a credit that isn't in the database yet, just rename the entry for that.

Russian users have also used "Дубликат" to mark these:
https://www.bookogs.com/search?q=%D0%94%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%82

Merge these corrector credits

Commonly we would merge to В. Авдеева (it's the older entry and has more entries), is that ok?

Commonly we would merge to В. Авдеева (it's the older entry and has more entries), is that ok?

Yes, I'll rename it later and correct ANV where it's necessary, thanks

Commonly we would merge to В. Авдеева (it's the older entry and has more entries), is that ok?

Yes, I'll rename it later and correct ANV where it's necessary, thanks

В. Авдеева
В. Л. Авдеева
I do not think that they are the same people. We don't know for sure. To me it looks like you are ruin the database.

It was only eight publications so it's not that big of an deal. It can be easily reverted if needed.

Is there any more information about this person other than the credits?

mirva wrote:

It was only eight publications so it's not that big of an deal. It can be easily reverted if needed.

Is there any more information about this person other than the credits?

It is important to me. I don't like to throw everything in one pile. We don't know anything about these people.

I'm not saying it's not important to me, just that the issue can be easily fixed if it turns out that they are two different people after all.

I'm not going to revert the edits right away, as we have another user saying they are the same. I'll wait until there's a confirmation either way.

If you don't know anything about this person/these persons, maybe you, or nickist420, could search for more information?

My Russian is only elementary, so would prefer if a person with better Russian skills would look into the issue.

mirva wrote:

I'm not saying it's not important to me, just that the issue can be easily fixed if it turns out that they are two different people after all.

I'm not going to revert the edits right away, as we have another user saying they are the same. I'll wait until there's a confirmation either way.

If you don't know anything about this person/these persons, maybe you, or nickist420, could search for more information?

My Russian is only elementary, so would prefer if a person with better Russian skills would look into the issue.

We won't find any information about these people. There are a lot of correctors, they changed often. Very little information about the people who worked in publishing houses.

degm wrote:

nickist420 wrote:

https://www.bookogs.com/credit/202799-leningradskaia-tipografiia-1-pechatnyi-dvor-im-a-m-gorkogo-glavpoligrafproma-komiteta-po-pechati-pri-sovete-ministrov-sssr

https://www.bookogs.com/credit/96785-leningradskaia-tipografiia-1-pechatnyi-dvor-im-a-m-gorkogo

https://www.bookogs.com/credit/42639-leningradskaia-tipografiia-1-pechatnyi-dvor-imeni-a-m-gorkogo-glavpoligrafproma-gosudarstvennogo-komiteta-soveta-ministrov-sssr-po-pechati

https://www.bookogs.com/credit/450083-leningradskaia-tipografiia-no-1-pechatnyi-dvor-im-a-m-gorkogo-glavpoligrafproma-gosudarstvennogo-komiteta-soveta-ministrov-sssr-po-pechati

https://www.bookogs.com/credit/450055-leningradskaia-tipografiia-no-1-pechatnyi-dvor-imeni-a-m-gorkogo-glavpoligrafproma-gosudarstvennogo-komiteta-soveta-ministrov-sssr-po-pechati

If it's possible merge all these above as they are ANV

I do not believe that these names should be merged.
Bookogs is already unique in that there are profiles of almost all printing houses (from USSR), such information is nowhere else. Why destroy it?
You are a new user, I would recommend that you take the time to review the database. Look at least 5,000 books. You have shown bad style - delete, merge, erase.

It's the same printing house, with same address. All the difference is the abbreviations which don't make any of them a unique priniting plant. The actual name is Печатный двор, while the rest part is mainly jurisdiction. It'd be ok if there is the same ANV system as in Discogs which to my mind is quite logical and convenient.

mirva wrote:

If you don't know anything about this person/these persons, maybe you, or nickist420, could search for more information?

Of course I can't prove beyond reasonable doubt that they're the same, but as I see in all merged books, this woman has the corrector role and worked for 2 publishers эксмо and молодая гвардия.

Login or Register to post a reply to this topic.